The ongoing surge in U.STreasury yields is becoming an overwhelming pressure point for the American economy, prompting discussions of intervention at the highest levels of government
Advertisements
The newly appointed Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent, has taken a proactive stance, frequently addressing the pressing issue in various forums and vowing that the government is committed to lowering the entire yield curve of U.Sdebt.
Among the most critical areas of focus is the 10-year Treasury yield, identified by Bessent as a “key target.” This particular yield is crucial, not only because it directly impacts the government’s borrowing costs, but also because it acts as a central determinant of private borrowing expensesThe interplay between government borrowing and private investment choices means that fluctuations in this yield ripple throughout the broader economic landscape, influencing everything from government spending initiatives to consumer behavior in areas such as housing and personal finance
Advertisements
The stakes are high, and the urgency palpable.
Yet, the road ahead is laden with challengesThe dynamics of yield determination are rooted in complex market mechanisms, influenced by a diverse array of stakeholders, including domestic and international investors and financial institutionsTheir buy-and-sell actions collectively shape the trajectory of Treasury yields, effectively constraining the government’s ability to intervene directlyIt’s akin to trying to steer a massive ship across a tumultuous ocean using nothing but sheer willpower—an exercise in futility for someNevertheless, Bessent remains undeterred, proposing a suite of targeted measures designed to creatively influence yields downward.
Among the initiatives is the “3-3-3” plan, wherein Bessent sets ambitious objectives: achieving a 3% real GDP growth rate while simultaneously reducing the deficit to 3% of GDP
Advertisements
Presently, the deficit hovers above 6%, which exerts upward pressure on Treasury yields as the government steps up borrowing to compensate for the shortfallAdditionally, a core component of this strategy includes ramping up U.Soil production by three million barrels per day, aiming to expand energy supply and consequently stabilize energy pricesUnderstanding the critical link between energy costs and inflation control, Bessent emphasizes that lower gasoline and heating oil prices would not only alleviate consumer expenses but also bolster consumer confidence, providing momentum for the economy in recovering from recent inflationary pressures.
However, this goal is fraught with challengesReports from the Kansas City Federal Reserve indicate that oil companies require an average price of $64 per barrel to maintain profitability; increasing drilling activity substantially necessitates a price of $91 per barrel
With West Texas Intermediate crude currently priced at around $71 per barrel, the economic incentives for producers to invest heavily in boosting output remain limitedMoreover, energy company stakeholders often prioritize immediate capital returns over engaging in investments that might lead to lower oil prices.
In addition to the “3-3-3” strategy, Bessent also focuses on the efficiency of government operations, particularly within the DOGE department, which could yield non-inflationary growth through spending cuts and regulatory reliefHowever, a recent warning from the nonpartisan “Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget” suggests that the budget resolutions currently under consideration by House leadership could double the growth rate of federal debt over the next decade
This alarming trend is attributed to what they term “explosive growth” in interest expenditures, with projections indicating that interest payments could account for 4.7% of GDP by 2025—significantly exceeding the previous high of 3.2%. Such figures pose monumental hurdles to achieving reduced debt levels and lower Treasury yields.
Finally, Bessent advocates for financial suppression methods, highlighted by a bipartisan proposal from Senators Bernie Sanders and Josh Hawley aimed at legislating a cap on credit card interest rates at 10%. This initiative emerges as an attempt to utilize regulatory mechanisms to directly influence interest rates and, consequently, the overall cost of capital in financial marketsAnalysts, however, express skepticism about the feasibility of such measures in a context where the U.S